Ab-initio superfluid weight and superconducting penetration depth
Kaja H. Hiorth, Martin Gutierrez-Amigo, Théo Cavignac, Kristjan Haule, Miguel A. L. Marques, Päivi Törmä
arXiv:2603.10955 · 2026-03-11
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Machine learning and high-throughput screening approaches to superconductor discovery require physically meaningful descriptors that capture essential physics while remaining computationally tractable. The superfluid weight is an ideal descriptor as it is a prerequisite for superconductivity, determines the magnetic penetration depth and the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature in two-dimensional materials, may limit the critical temperature in unconventional superconductors through phase coherence, and reveals quantum geometric contributions to supercurrent transport. We develop a computationally efficient framework for calculating the zero-temperature, mean-field superfluid weight for uniform pairing from density functional theory band structures and Bloch wavefunctions. We separately evaluate the conventional contribution from band curvature and the geometric contribution from quantum geometry. To validate the method, we calculate London penetration depths for a few conventional superconductors (Al, Pb, Nb, MgB$_2$, LuRu$_3$B$_2$ and YRu$_3$B$_2$) and find good agreement with experiment after accounting for nonlocal corrections, strong-coupling effects, and sample quality. The conventional contribution dominates by orders of magnitude in these wide-band materials, as expected. This framework provides a foundation for large-scale screening of superconducting candidates and exploring quantum geometric effects in unconventional superconductors.
Similar papers
Ab initio superfluid weight and superconducting penetration depth
similarity 0.91Kaja H. Hiorth et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossing over from flat band superconductivity to conventional superconductivity
similarity 0.90M. Thumin & G. Bouzerar · 2025 · arXiv:2507.07701
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Band-basis decomposition of superfluid weight in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene: Quantifying geometric and conventional contributions
similarity 0.90Jian Zhou · 2026 · arXiv:2604.05994
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and geometric superfluid weight of a tunable flat band system
similarity 0.89M. A. Mojarro & Sergio E. Ulloa · 2025 · arXiv:2512.09901
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy on Single Crystal MgB2
similarity 0.89M. R. Eskildsen et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0209345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of a boron isotope effect in the magnetic penetration depth of MgB
similarity 0.89D. Di Castro et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified