Multilayer model for coatings with arbitrary layers for superconducting radio-frequency applications
Aaron Gobeyn, Wolfgang Ackermann, Herbert De Gersem
arXiv:2605.07958 · 2026-05-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We extend the multilayer model of \etal{Kubo} for superconductor-insulator-superconductor (SIS) structures in two ways: first, by generalizing it to arbitrary sequences of layers of arbitrary type, i.e. superconducting, normal conducting, and insulating; and second, by accounting for all contributions, including ohmic losses and dielectric effects. We examine the maximum applicable field for $(\text{SI})^n\text{S}$ structures. We find that the optimum configuration corresponds to the $n=1$ case. However, the thickness of the superconducting coating layers can be reduced to below their penetration depth with minor performance penalty. We discuss the ability to model transitions in SS bilayers by introducing a set of virtual layers that represent the transition region through interpolated parameters. We find degradation of the maximum applicable field with thicker transition layers, and a larger effective penetration depth of the electromagnetic fields. Furthermore, the surface impedance of the multilayer structure is calculated using the Leontovich boundary condition, yielding a formulation suitable for integration into finite element simulations. Additionally, the Poynting theorem is used to determine the loss contributions of individual layers.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb3Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Theoretical estimates of maximum fields in superconducting resonant radio frequency cavities: Stability theory, disorder, and laminates
similarity 0.91Danilo B. Liarte et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.00175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Case studies on time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations for superconducting applications
similarity 0.89Cun Xue et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.03729
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Depth-resolved Characterization of Meissner Screening Breakdown in Surface Treated Niobium
similarity 0.89Edward Thoeng et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.05451
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disentangling superconductor and dielectric microwave losses in sub-micron / interconnects using a multi-mode microstrip resonator
similarity 0.88Cougar A. T. Garcia et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.10685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnon radiation by moving Abrikosov vortices in ferromagnetic superconductors and superconductor-ferromagnet multilayers
similarity 0.88A. A. Bespalov et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.7620
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Response to comment on theoretical RF field limits of multilayer coating structures of superconducting resonator cavities
similarity 0.88Sam Posen et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.4479
Source status unknown — claims are unverified