On Electric Fields in Low Temperature Superconductors
Jan Govaerts, Damien Bertrand, Geoffrey Stenuit
arXiv:cond-mat/0006070 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/14/7/308 · 2000-06-05 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The manifestly Lorentz covariant Landau-Ginzburg equations coupled to Maxwell's equations are considered as a possible framework for the effective description of the interactions between low temperature superconductors and magnetic as well as electric fields. A specific experimental set-up, involving a nanoscopic superconductor and only static applied fields whose geometry is crucial however, is described, which should allow to confirm or invalidate the covariant model through the determination of the temperature dependency of the critical magnetic-electric field phase diagram and the identification of some distinctive features it should display.
Similar papers
On the dynamics of the Meissner and the Becker-London effects
similarity 0.92Peter Markoš & Richard Hlubina · 2025 · arXiv:2511.03384
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in dilute system of sites with strong electron-electron attraction
similarity 0.91Alexander Yu. Zyuzin · 2020 · arXiv:2012.12597
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
London's limit for the lattice superconductor
similarity 0.89S. A. Ktitorov · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS Superconductivity in Quantum Critical Metals
similarity 0.89Jian-Huang She & Jan Zaanen · 2009 · arXiv:0905.1225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Oscillatory magnetic field-dependent critical temperatures of ultraclean Type-II superconductors
similarity 0.89Aiying Zhao et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.05111
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evaluating Superconductors through Current Induced Depairing
similarity 0.89Milind N. Kunchur · 2019 · arXiv:1907.00427
Source status unknown — claims are unverified