Tunneling through an Anderson impurity between superconductors
Yshai Avishai, Anatoly Golub, Andrei D. Zaikin
arXiv:cond-mat/0007098 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.134515 · 2000-07-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider an Anderson impurity (A) weakly connected to a superconducting electrode (S) on one side and a superconducting or a normal metal electrode (N) on the other side. A general path integral formalism is developed and the response of SAN and SAS junctions to a constant voltage bias V is elucidated, using a combination of the Keldysh technique (to handle non-equilibrium effects) and a dynamical mean field approximation (to handle repulsive Hubbard interactions). An interesting physics is exposed at sub-gap voltages ($eV < Δ$ for SAN and $eV < 2 Δ$ for SAS). For an SAN junction, Andreev reflection is strongly affected by Coulomb interaction. For superconductors with p-wave symmetry the junction conductance exhibits a remarkable peak at $eV < Δ$, while for superconductors with s-wave symmetric pair potential the peak is shifted towards the gap edge $eV=Δ$ and strongly suppressed if the Hubbard repulsive interaction increases.Electron transport in SAS junctions is determined by an interplay between multiple Andreev reflection (MAR) and Coulomb effects. For s-wave superconductors the usual peaks in the conductance that originate from MAR are shifted by interaction to larger values of V. They are also suppressed as the Hubbard interaction strength grows. For p-wave superconductors the sub-gap current is much larger and the I-V characteristics reveal a new feature, namely, a peak in the current resulting from a mid-gap bound state in the junction.
Similar papers
Theory of Andreev and shot noise spectroscopy for topological superconductors probed by -wave superconducting tips
similarity 0.87Jushin Tei et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.14537
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Andreev conductance in InAs-AlSb quantum well structures with Nb electrodes
similarity 0.86Chanh Nguyen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev versus Tunneling Spectroscopy of Unconventional Flat Band Superconductors
similarity 0.85Sayak Biswas et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.07744
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection at the edge of a two-dimentional semimetal
similarity 0.85A. Kononov et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1511.08085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-channel point-contact tunneling theory of superconductors
similarity 0.85Mikael Fogelstrom et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1409.3181
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev current enhancement and subgap conductance of superconducting hybrid structures in the presence of a small spin-splitting field
similarity 0.85A. Ozaeta et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.3679
Source status unknown — claims are unverified