Andreev bound states in high-$T_c$ superconducting junctions
T. Lofwander, V. S. Shumeiko, G. Wendin
arXiv:cond-mat/0102276 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/14/5/201 · 2001-02-15 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The formation of bound states at surfaces of materials with an energy gap in the bulk electron spectrum is a well known physical phenomenon. At superconductor surfaces, quasiparticles with energies inside the superconducting gap $Δ$ may be trapped in bound states in quantum wells, formed by total reflection against the vacuum and total Andreev reflection against the superconductor. Since an electron reflects as a hole and sends a Cooper pair into the superconductor, the surface states give rise to resonant transport of quasiparticle and Cooper pair currents, and may be observed in tunneling spectra. In superconducting junctions, these surface states may hybridize and form bound Andreev states, trapped between the superconducting electrodes. In d-wave superconductors, the order parameter changes sign under $90^o$ rotation and, as a consequence, Andreev reflection may lead to the formation of zero energy quasiparticle bound states, midgap states (MGS). The formation of MGS is a robust feature of d-wave superconductivity and provides a unified framework for many important effects which will be reviewed: large Josephson current, low-temperature anomaly of the critical Josephson current, $π$-junction behavior, $0\to π$ junction crossover with temperature, zero-bias conductance peaks, paramagnetic currents, time reversal symmetry breaking, spontaneous interface currents, and resonance features in subgap currents. Taken together these effects, when observed in experiments, provide proof for d-wave superconductivity in the cuprates.
Similar papers
Andreev Bound States in High Temperature Superconductors
similarity 0.90L. Alff et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev bound states and supercurrent in an unconventional superconductor-altermagnetic Josephson junction
similarity 0.89Mohammad Alipourzadeh & Yaser Hajati · 2025 · arXiv:2503.21391
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Discrete-lattice model approach to the tunneling between d-wave superconductors: interference of tunnel bonds
similarity 0.88A. M. Bobkov · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0512129
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Order, disorder and tunable gaps in the spectrum of Andreev bound states in a multi-terminal superconducting device
similarity 0.88Yokoyama, Tomohiro et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1609.05455
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle energy spectrum in ferromagnetic Josephson weak links
similarity 0.88L. Dobrosavljević-Grujić et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9911339
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev - Saint James reflections: a probe of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88Guy Deutscher · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0409225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified