The surface barrier in mesoscopic type I and type II superconductors
Alexander D. Hernandez, Daniel Dominguez
arXiv:cond-mat/0102444 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144529 · 2001-02-23 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the surface barrier for magnetic field penetration in mesoscopic samples of both type I and type II superconductors. Our results are obtained from numerical simulations of the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations. We calculate the dependence of the first field for flux penetration ($H_p$) with the Ginzburg-Landau parameter ($κ$) observing an increase of $H_p$ with decreasing $κ$ for a superconductor-insulator boundary condition ($(\nabla -iA)Ψ|_n=0$) while for a superconductor-normal boundary condition (approximated by the limiting case of $Ψ|_S=0$) $H_p$ has a smaller value independent of $κ$ and proportional to $H_c$. We study the magnetization curves and penetration fields at different sample sizes and for square and thin film geometries. For small mesoscopic samples we study the peaks and discontinuous jumps found in the magnetization as a function of magnetic field. To interpret these jumps we consider that vortices located inside the sample induce a reinforcement of the surface barrier at fields greater than the first penetration field $H_{p1}$. This leads to multiple penetration fields $H_{pi} = H_{p1}, H_{p2}, H_{p3}, ...$ for vortex entrance in mesoscopic samples. We study the dependence with sample size of the penetration fields $H_{pi}$. We explain these multiple penetration fields extending the usual Bean-Livingston analysis by considering the effect of vortices inside the superconductor and the finite size of the sample.
Similar papers
Surface barrier in mesoscopic type-I and type-II superconductors
similarity 0.90Alexander D. Hernández & Daniel Domínguez
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Bean-Livingston barrier at a superconductor/magnet interface
similarity 0.90Yu. A. Genenko et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Maximum screening fields of superconducting multilayer structures
similarity 0.89Alex Gurevich · 2015 · arXiv:1501.01512
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner-London currents in superconductors with rectangular cross section
similarity 0.89Ernst Helmut Brandt & Grigorii P. Mikitik · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0008260
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex configurations and metastability in mesoscopic superconductors
similarity 0.89Clécio C. de Souza Silva et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403077
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Boundary conditions for quasiclassical equations in the theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.89C. J. Lambert et al. · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9610185
Source status unknown — claims are unverified