Andreev reflection in Au/La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4} point-contact junctions: separation between pseudogap and phase-coherence gap
R. S. Gonnelli, A. Calzolari, D. Daghero, L. Natale, G. A. Ummarino, V. A. Stepanov, M. Ferretti
arXiv:cond-mat/0107289 · DOI 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00228-7 · 2001-07-13 · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We made point-contact measurements with Au tips on La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4} samples with 0.08 < x < 0.20 to investigate the relationship between superconducting gap and pseudogap. We obtained junctions whose conductance curves presented typical Andreev reflection features at all temperatures from 4.2 K up to T_c^A close to the bulk T_c. Their fit with the BTK-Tanaka-Kashiwaya model gives good results if a (s+d)-wave gap symmetry is used. The doping dependence of the low temperature dominant isotropic gap component Delta_{s} follows very well the T_{c} vs. x curve. These results support the separation between the superconducting (Andreev) gap and the pseudogap measured by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and tunneling.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.92Sr0.08CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.90Sr0.10CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.88Sr0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.87Sr0.13CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 29.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Evidence for pseudogap and phase-coherence gap separation by Andreev reflection experiments in Au/La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_4 point-contact junctions
similarity 0.93R. S. Gonnelli et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0101209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible d+id scenario in La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_4 by point-contact measurements
similarity 0.91D. Daghero et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0207411
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of two Andreev-like energy scales in superconductor/normal-metal/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.90Gad Koren & Tal Kirzhner · 2011 · arXiv:1101.1175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct doping dependences of the pseudogap and superconducting gap LaSrCuO cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.90M. Hashimoto et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of a pseudogap and a superconducting gap for the high−Tc superconductor La2−xSrxCuO4 studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.90T. Yoshida et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-triplet superconductivity in SrRuO probed by Andreev reflection
similarity 0.89F. Laube et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907267
Source status unknown — claims are unverified