Observation of two Andreev-like energy scales in $La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_4$ superconductor/normal-metal/superconductor junctions
Gad Koren, Tal Kirzhner
arXiv:1101.1175 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.017002 · 2011-01-06 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Conductance spectra measurements of highly transparent ramp-type junctions made of superconducting $La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_4$ electrodes and non superconducting $La_{1.65}Sr_{0.35}CuO_4$ barrier are reported. At low temperatures below $T_c$, these junctions have two prominent Andreev-like conductance peaks with clear steps at energies $Δ_1$ and $Δ_2$ with $Δ_2 > 2Δ_1$. No such peaks appear above $T_c$. The doping dependence at 2 K shows that both $Δ_1$ and $Δ_2$ scale roughly as $T_c$. $Δ_1$ is identified as the superconducting energy gap, while a few scenarios are proposed as for the origin of $Δ_2$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.875Sr0.125CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.82Sr0.18CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Observation of Two Andreev-Like Energy Scales in La2−xSrxCuO4 Superconductor–Normal-Metal–Superconductor Junctions
similarity 0.93G. Koren & T. Kirzhner
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct doping dependences of the pseudogap and superconducting gap LaSrCuO cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.90M. Hashimoto et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal versus Material-Dependent Two-Gap Behaviors in the High-Tc Cuprates: Angle-Resolved Photoemission Study of La2-xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.90T. Yoshida et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.0155
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for pseudogap and phase-coherence gap separation by Andreev reflection experiments in Au/La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_4 point-contact junctions
similarity 0.89R. S. Gonnelli et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0101209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The coherent {\it d}-wave superconducting gap in underdoped LaSrCuO as studied by angle-resolved photoemission
similarity 0.89M. Shi et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0708.2333
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in Au/La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4} point-contact junctions: separation between pseudogap and phase-coherence gap
similarity 0.89R. S. Gonnelli et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0107289
Source status unknown — claims are unverified