Comment on cond-mat/0007299 by Schofield and Sandeman : inconsistency with experiments
George Kastrinakis
arXiv:cond-mat/0112478 · 2001-12-28 · arXiv: Strongly Correlated Electrons
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The inconsistency of cond-mat/0007299 and Phys. Rev. B 63 094510 (2001) with ARPES and resistivity data is pointed-out.
Similar papers
Reply to the Comment on 'Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultra-Thin Superconducting Wires'
similarity 0.84Andrei D. Zaikin et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9703139
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in a Toy Model of the Pseudogap State
similarity 0.83E. Z. Kuchinskii & M. V. Sadovskii · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910261
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
True Superconductivity in a 2D "Superconducting-Insulating" System
similarity 0.83Nadya Mason & Aharon Kapitulnik · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0006138
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conjectures for the microscopic theory of high temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.83Bumsoo Kyung · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0008406
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A two band model for Superconductivity: Probing interband pair formation
similarity 0.83R. E. Lagos & G. G. Cabrera · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311196
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence against superconductivity in flux trapping experiments on hydrides under high pressure & On magnetic field screening and expulsion in hydride superconductors
similarity 0.83J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2022 · arXiv:2207.01541
Source status unknown — claims are unverified