← Back to search

Comment on "Superconducting anisotropy and evidence for intrinsic pinning in single crystalline MgB2"

M. Angst, R. Puzniak, A. Wisniewski, J. Roos, H. Keller, J. Karpinski

arXiv:cond-mat/0206407 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.226501 · 2002-06-21 · Physical Review B

T2theoretical1 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. B 66, 012501 (2002)], torque data measured on a MgB2 single crystal in fields from 10 to 60 kOe at 10 K were presented. The authors obtained the anisotropy gamma by fitting a theoretical expression to the data and concluded that the anisotropy is field independent gamma \approx 4.3. They also reported the observation of "intrinsic pinning", which they take as experimental evidence for the occurence of superconductivity in the boron layers. In this comment, we discuss the range of validity of the theoretical expression used by the authors and show that the conclusion of a field independent anisotropy does not hold. Furthermore, we present torque data measured on two crystals of MgB2, establishing the extrinsic nature of the peak in the irreversible torque observed in some crystals.

Similar papers