The low-energy phase-only action in a superconductor: a comparison with the XY model
L. Benfatto, A. Toschi, S. Caprara
arXiv:cond-mat/0302255 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.184510 · 2003-02-13 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The derivation of the effective theory for the phase degrees of freedom in a superconductor is still, to some extent, an open issue. It is commonly assumed that the classical XY model and its quantum generalizations can be exploited as effective phase-only models. In the quantum regime, however, this assumption leads to spurious results, such as the violation of the Galilean invariance in the continuum model. Starting from a general microscopic model, in this paper we explicitly derive the effective low-energy theory for the phase, up to fourth-order terms. This expansion allows us to properly take into account dynamic effects beyond the Gaussian level, both in the continuum and in the lattice model. After evaluating the one-loop correction to the superfluid density we critically discuss the qualitative and quantitative differences between the results obtained within the quantum XY model and within the correct low-energy theory, both in the case of s-wave and d-wave symmetry of the superconducting order parameter. Specifically, we find dynamic anharmonic vertices, which are absent in the quantum XY model, and are crucial to restore Galilean invariance in the continuum model. As far as the more realistic lattice model is concerned, in the weak-to-intermediate-coupling regime we find that the phase-fluctuation effects are quantitatively reduced with respect to the XY model. On the other hand, in the strong-coupling regime we show that the correspondence between the microscopically derived action and the quantum XY model is recovered, except for the low-density regime.
Similar papers
Low-energy phase-only action in a superconductor: A comparison with the XY model
similarity 0.94L. Benfatto et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherence length in superconductors from weak to strong coupling
similarity 0.91L. Benfatto et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0109486
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of Decoupling in the Mixed Phase of Extremely Type-II Layered Superconductors
similarity 0.89J. P. Rodriguez · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0006176
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase fluctuations in superconductors: from Galilean invariant to quantum XY models
similarity 0.89L. Benfatto et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104226
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical excitation of phase modes in strongly disordered superconductors
similarity 0.89T. Cea et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1401.3637
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detecting Topological Phase Transition in Superconductor-Semiconductor Hybrids by Electronic Raman Spectroscopy
similarity 0.89Takeshi Mizushima et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2502.19841
Source status unknown — claims are unverified