Staggered-flux normal state in the weakly doped t-J model
D. A. Ivanov, Patrick A. Lee
arXiv:cond-mat/0305143 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.132501 · 2003-05-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A normal (non-superconducting) ground state of the t-J model may be variationally approximated by a Gutzwiller-projected wave function. Within this approximation, at small hole doping near half-filling, the normal state favors staggered-flux ordering. Such a staggered-flux state may occur in vortex cores of underdoped high-temperature cuprate superconductors. From comparing the energies of the staggered-flux state and of the superconducting state, we numerically obtain the condensation energy. Extracting the superfluid density directly from the projected superconducting wave function, we can also estimate the coherence length at zero temperature.
Similar papers
Perturbative studies of the conductivity in the vortex-liquid regime
similarity 0.89T. Blum & M. A. Moore · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9704132
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Staggered Currents in the Vortex Core
similarity 0.89Jung Hoon Han et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0012450
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Staggered currents in the mixed state
similarity 0.89Qiang-Hua Wang et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102048
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional t-J model
similarity 0.89S. Sorella et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-Particle Density of States of a Superconductor with a Spatially Varying Gap and Phase Fluctuations
similarity 0.89Daniel Valdez-Balderas & David Stroud · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610055
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The role of domain walls on the vortex creep dynamics in unconventional superconducors
similarity 0.88Manfred Sigrist & Daniel F. Agterberg · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910526
Source status unknown — claims are unverified