← Back to search

Enhancement of the irreversibility field by carbon substitution in single crystal MgB$_2$

E. Ohmichi, T. Masui, S. Lee, S. Tajima, T. Osada

arXiv:cond-mat/0312348 · DOI 10.1143/JPSJ.73.2065 · 2003-12-14 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T2theoretical40 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the detailed study of the irreversibility field {\hirr} of single crystals of Mg(B$_{1-x}$C$_{x}$)$_2$ ($x$=0, 2, 3.5, 5 and 7%) in strong magnetic fields of up to 40 T. High sensitive torque measurements revealed that the {\hirr} is greatly enhanced by a factor of two ($μ_{0}${\hirr}(0)$\simeq$33 T in $x$=5%) by carbon substitution compared to the pristine {\mgb} owing to a reduction in the inplane coherence length. We also observed the temperature-dependent {\hirr} anisotropy in all the carbon contents. This fact strongly suggests that the two-gap superconductivity of {\mgb} is less influenced by a small amount of carbon substitution. We discuss these results focusing on the impact of carrier doping and impurity scattering on two-gap superconductor.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

39Pressure not reportedonset
Mg(B0.98C0.02)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

35Pressure not reportedonset
Mg(B0.95C0.05)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

27Pressure not reportedonset
Mg(B0.925C0.075)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers