Magnetic and superconducting properties of RuSr2 Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10-x samples: dependence on the oxygen content and ageing effects
C. A. Cardoso, A. J. C. Lanfredi, A. J. Chiquito, V. P. S. Awana, H. Kishan, R. L. de Almeida, O. F. de Lima, F. M. Araujo-Moreira
arXiv:cond-mat/0502674 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.134509 · 2005-02-28 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetic and superconducting properties of RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10-x polycrystalline samples with different oxygen doping level are presented. A strong suppression of the superconducting temperature (Tc), as well as a reduction in the superconducting fraction, occurs as the oxygen content is reduced by annealing the samples in oxygen deprived atmospheres. Drastic changes in the electrical resistivity are observed above Tc, possibly associated with oxygen removal mainly from grain boundaries. However, the magnetic ordering is relatively less affected by the changes in oxygen content of the samples. The spin glass transition is enhanced and shifted to higher temperatures with the reduction in oxygen content. This could be correlated with an increase in the spins disorder and frustration for the oxygen depleted samples. Also, the same oxygen vacancy induced disorder could explain the reduction in the fraction of the sample showing antiferromagnetic order. We also report significant changes in the measured properties of the samples as a function of time.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic and superconducting properties of RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ samples: Dependence on the oxygen content and aging effects
similarity 0.93C. A. Cardoso et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-Superconducting phase-diagram of Eu2-xCexRuSr2Cu2O10
similarity 0.90I. Felner et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Oxygen Content and Valence of Ru in RuSr2(Gd0.75Ce0.25)2Cu2O10(Ru-1222) Magnetosuperconductor
similarity 0.90V. P. S. Awana et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0209375
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hysteresis and stepwise structure in MR curves of granular superconducting ruthenocuprates RuSr(GdCeCuO}
similarity 0.90B. I. Belevtsev et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1205.6743
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Glass Behavior in the Ru-1222 and Ru-1212 rutheno-cuprate families: a comparative study
similarity 0.90C. A. Cardoso et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305411
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct Observation of Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Superconductivity in RuSr2(Gd0.7Ce0.3)2Cu2O10
similarity 0.90S. Y. Chen et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified