Nanoscale ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet switches controlled by magnetization orientation
Klaus Halterman, Oriol T. Valls
arXiv:cond-mat/0506147 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.060514 · 2005-06-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study clean ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet (FSF) nanostructures in which the magnetization of the F layers can be parallel (P) or antiparallel (AP). We consider the case where the thickness of the S layer is of order of the coherence length, with thinner F layers. We find that reversing the direction of the magnetization in one of the F layers leads in general to drastic changes in the superconductor's state. Under a wide variety of conditions, the AP geometry favors superconductivity. Magnetization reversal in one of the F layers can lead to the superconductivity turning on and off, or to switching between different states. Our results are obtained via self consistent solution of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations and evaluation of the condensation energies of the system.
Similar papers
Peculiarities of performance of the spin valve for the superconducting current
similarity 0.90P. V. Leksin et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.3939
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate-Tunable Superconducting Spin Valve in a van der Waals Ferromagnet/Superconductor/Ferromagnet Trilayer
similarity 0.90A. S. Ianovskaia et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2512.09093
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effects and triplet correlations in ferromagnet/ferromagnet/superconductor nanostructures
similarity 0.90Chien-Te Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stability of junction configurations in ferromagnet-superconductor heterostructures
similarity 0.90Klaus Halterman & Oriol T. Valls · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404058
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect in superconductor/conical magnet heterostructures
similarity 0.90Daniel Fritsch & James F. Annett · 2014 · arXiv:1409.0366
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting triplet spin valve
similarity 0.90Ya. V. Fominov et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.2113
Source status unknown — claims are unverified