← Back to search

Inverse spin switch effects in Ferromagnet / Superconductor hybrids with strong ferromagnets

A. Yu. Rusanov, S. Habraken, J. Aarts

arXiv:cond-mat/0509156 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.060505 · 2005-09-06 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical83 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In F/S/F trilayers where the magnetization directions of the F layers can be controlled separately, it has theoretically been predicted that the antiparallel (AP) configuration can have a higher superconducting transition temperature T_c than the parallel configuration. This is the so-called spin switch, which also experimentally has been found for the case of weak ferromagnets. Here we show that strong ferromagnets yield the opposite effect. We study the transport properties of F/S/F trilayers with F = Ni_0.80Fe_0.20 (Permalloy, Py) and S = Nb, structured in strips of different sizes. Using two different thicknesses for the Py layers, we can switch in a well-defined way between the AP- and P-configurations. In the superconducting transition we find a clear increase of the resistance in the AP-state. We ascribe this to enhanced reflection of spin-polarized quasiparticles at the S/F interfaces which leads to a stronger suppression of superconductivity on the S-side.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9.2Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.7Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4Pressure not reportedonset
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.46Pressure not reportedmidpoint
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers