Crossover from weak to strong coupling regime in dispersive circuit QED
I. Serban, E. Solano, F. K. Wilhelm
arXiv:cond-mat/0606734 · DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/80/40011 · 2006-06-28 · EPL (Europhysics Letters)
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the decoherence of a superconducting qubit due to the dispersive coupling to a damped harmonic oscillator. We go beyond the weak qubit-oscillator coupling, which we associate with a phase Purcell effect, and enter into a strong coupling regime, with qualitatively different behavior of the dephasing rate. We identify and give a physicaly intuitive discussion of both decoherence mechanisms. Our results can be applied, with small adaptations, to a large variety of other physical systems, e. g. trapped ions and cavity QED, boosting theoretical and experimental decoherence studies.
Similar papers
Quantum nondemolition-like fast measurement scheme for a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.90I. Serban et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: an architecture for quantum computation
similarity 0.88Alexandre Blais et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0402216
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Lifetime renormalization of driven weakly anharmonic superconducting qubits: II. The readout problem
similarity 0.88Alexandru Petrescu et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.01240
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Circuit QED and engineering charge based superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88S M Girvin et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.3902
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak and strong measurement of a qubit using a switching-based detector
similarity 0.87S. Ashhab et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.4386
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entangled State Synthesis for Superconducting Resonators
similarity 0.87Frederick W. Strauch et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.5801
Source status unknown — claims are unverified