Dispersive Charge and Flux Qubit Readout as a Quantum Measurement Process
L. Tornberg, G. Johansson
arXiv:cond-mat/0610732 · 2006-10-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the dispersive readout of superconducting charge and flux qubits as a quantum measurement process. The measurement oscillator frequency is considered much lower than the qubit frequency. This regime is interesting because large detuning allows for strong coupling between the measurement oscillator and the signal transmission line, thus allowing for fast readout. Due to the large detuning we may not use the rotating wave approximation in the oscillator-qubit coupling. Instead we start from an approximation where the qubit follows the oscillator adiabatically, and show that non-adiabatic corrections are small. We find analytic expressions for the measurement time, as well as for the back-action, both while measuring and in the off-state. The quantum efficiency is found to be unity within our approximation, both for charge and flux qubit readout.
Similar papers
Quantum state detection of a superconducting flux qubit using a DC-SQUID in the inductive mode
similarity 0.91A. Lupascu et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410730
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiplexed dispersive readout of superconducting phase qubits
similarity 0.91Yu Chen et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1209.1781
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analysis of measurement errors for a superconducting phase qubit
similarity 0.90Qin Zhang et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nondestructive readout for a superconducting flux qubit
similarity 0.89A. Lupascu et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Qubits and Computing
similarity 0.89G. Wendin & V. S. Shumeiko · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508729
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing the quantum coherence of a nanomechanical resonator using a superconducting qubit II: Implementation
similarity 0.89M. P. Blencowe & A. D. Armour · 2008 · arXiv:0804.2179
Source status unknown — claims are unverified