Simulation of some quantum gates, with decoherence
V. Corato, P. Silvestrini, A. Gorlich, P. Korcyl, J. Wosiek, L. Stodolsky
arXiv:cond-mat/0611445 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.184507 · 2006-11-16 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Methods and results for numerical simulations of one and two interacting rf-Squid systems suitable for adiabatic quantum gates are presented. These are based on high accuracy numerical solutions to the static and time dependent Schroedinger equation for the full Squid Hamiltonian in one and two variables. Among the points examined in the static analysis is the range of validity of the effective two-state or ``spin 1/2'' picture. A range of parameters is determined where the picture holds to good accuracy as the energy levels undergo gate manipulations. Some general points are presented concerning the relations between device parameters and ``good'' quantum mechanical state spaces. The time dependent simulations allow the examination of suitable conditions for adiabatic behavior, and permits the introduction of a random noise to simulate the effects of decoherence. A formula is derived and tested relating the random noise to the decoherence rate. Sensitivity to device and operating parameters for the logical gates NOT and CNOT are examined, with particular attention to values of the tunnel parameter beta slightly above one. It appears that with values of beta close to one, a quantum CNOT gate is possible even with rather short decoherence times. Many of the methods and results will apply to coupled double-potential well systems in general.
Similar papers
A finite element method for the quasiclassical theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.88Kevin Marc Seja & Tomas Lofwander · 2022 · arXiv:2205.09001
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Floquet Fluxonium Molecule: Driving Down Dephasing in Coupled Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.87Matthew Thibodeau et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.08762
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pure dephasing in flux qubits due to flux noise with spectral density scaling as
similarity 0.87S. M. Anton et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1111.7272
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low temperature decoherence and relaxation in charge Josephson-junction qubits
similarity 0.87Alex Grishin et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0608445
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence in Josephson qubits
similarity 0.86G. Falci et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312550
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Qubit decoherence by low-frequency noise
similarity 0.86K. Rabenstein et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401519
Source status unknown — claims are unverified