Generation of high-fidelity controlled-not logic gates by coupled superconducting qubits
Andrei Galiautdinov
arXiv:cond-mat/0701532 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.052303 · 2007-01-22 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Building on the previous results of the Weyl chamber steering method, we demonstrate how to generate high-fidelity controlled-not by direct application of certain, physically relevant Hamiltonians with fixed coupling constants containing Rabi terms. Such Hamiltonians are often used to describe two superconducting qubits driven by local rf-pulses. It is found that in order to achieve 100% fidelity in a system with capacitive coupling of strength g one Rabi term suffices. We give the exact values of the physical parameters needed to implement such CNOT. The gate time and all possible Rabi frequencies are found to be t=pi/(2g) and Omega_1/g = sqrt(64n^2-1), n=1,2,3,... . Generation of a perfect CNOT in a system with inductive coupling, characterized by additional constant k, requires the presence of both Rabi terms. The gate time is again t = pi/(2g), but now there is an infinite number of solutions, each of which is valid in a certain range of k and is characterized by a pair of positive integers (n,m). We distinguish two cases, depending on the sign of the coupling constant: (1) the antiferromagnetic case (k>=0); (2) the ferromagnetic case (k<=0). The paper concludes with consideration of fidelity degradation by switching to resonance. Simulation of time-evolution based on the 4th order Magnus expansion reveals characteristics of the gate similar to those found in the exact case, with slightly shorter gate time and shifted values of Rabi frequencies.
Similar papers
Spectroscopy of superconducting charge qubits coupled by a Josephson inductance
similarity 0.90T. Yamamoto et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0802.0353
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Controlled-NOT logic with nonresonant Josephson phase qubits
similarity 0.90Andrei Galiautdinov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hamiltonian for coupled flux qubits
similarity 0.90Alec Maassen van den Brink · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310425
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-frequency suppression of inductive coupling between flux qubit and transmission line resonator
similarity 0.90Sahel Ashhab et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.07849
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Protected Symmetrical Superconducting Qubit Based on Quantum Flux Parametron
similarity 0.90Kian Rafati Sajedi et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2505.06593
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantized resonator field coupled to a current-biased Josephson junction in circuit QED
similarity 0.89Christian Kraglund Andersen et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1312.5863
Source status unknown — claims are unverified