← Back to search

Response to Greiter's Comment

Eugene Demler, Shou-Cheng Zhang, Stefan Meixner, Werner Hanke

arXiv:cond-mat/9705191 · 1997-05-20 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T31 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Greiter claimed erroneously that the pi-excitation of the Hubbard model has an energy of the order of U. This mistake originates from a inconsistent treatment of the two particle Hartree energy and the Hartee correction to the chemical potential. In any self-consistent calculations, these two contributions cancel exactly, as shown by Kohn, Luttinger and Ward. We also show that his interpretation of the finite-size studies is inconsistent.

Similar papers