Normal state pseudogap and (π,0) feature in the underdoped high-T_c cuprates. A microscopical theory
F. Onufrieva, P. Pfeuty
arXiv:cond-mat/9807268 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3136 · 1998-07-19 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We show that a simple 2D electron system on a square lattice with hoping between more than nearest neighbors exhibits in the presence of electron spin exchange interaction properties strikingly similar to those observed in the underdoped cuprates It is a normal state pseudogap, its behaviour with doping and T, a form of the spectrum around (0,π) etc. The motor is the electronic topological transition which due to two-dimensionality gets new features with respect to well-studied 3D case.
Similar papers
Pseudogap in underdoped cuprates and spin-density-wave fluctuations
similarity 0.92Sedrakyan, Tigran A. & Chubukov, Andrey V. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.3824
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Fluctuations and Spectral Properties of Underdoped Cuprates
similarity 0.91M. Franz & A. J. Millis · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9805401
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Concepts in High Temperature Superconductivity
similarity 0.91E. W. Carlson et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic fluctuations and resonant peak in cuprates: a microscopic theory
similarity 0.90I. Sega et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211090
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping and temperature dependence of the pseudogap and Fermi arcs in cuprates from -CDW short-range fluctuations in the context of the t-J model
similarity 0.90Matías Bejas et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1102.1596
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalies in the pseudogap phase of the cuprates: Competing ground states and the role of umklapp scattering
similarity 0.90Neil J. Robinson et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1906.09005
Source status unknown — claims are unverified