AC Loss and Contact Resistance In Copper-Stabilized Nb3Al Rutherford Cables with and without a Stainless Steel Core
M. D. Sumption, R. M. Scanlan, A. Nijhuis, E. W. Collings
arXiv:cond-mat/9911191 · DOI 10.1109/77.828448 · 1999-11-12 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Calorimetric measurements of AC loss and hence interstrand contact resistance (ICR), were measured on three samples of Rutherford cable wound with Cu-stabilized jelly-roll type unplated Nb3Al strand. One of the cable types was furnished with a thin core of AISI 316L stainless steel and the other two were both uncored but insulated in different ways. The cables were subjected to a room-temperature-applied uniaxial pressure of 12 MPa that was maintained during the reaction heat treatment (RHT), then vacuum impregnated with CTD 101 epoxy, and repressurized to 100 MPa during AC-loss measurement. The measurements were performed at 4.2 K in a sinusoidal field of amplitude 400 mT at frequencies of 1 to 90 mHz (no DC-bias field) that was applied both perpendicular and parallel to the face of the cable (the face-on, FO, and edge-on, EO, directions, respectively). For the cored cable the FO-measured effective ICR (FO-ICR), was 5.27 . Those for the uncored cables were less than 0.08 . As shown previously for NbTi- and Nb3Sn-based Rutherford cables, the FO-ICR can be significantly increased by the insertion of a core, although in this case it is still below the range recommended for accelerator-magnet use. Post-measurement dissection of one of the cables showed that the impregnating resin had permeated between the strands and coated the core with a thin, insulating layer excepting for some sintered points of contact. In the uncored cables the strands were coated with resin except for the points of interstrand contact. It is suggested that in the latter case this tendency for partial coating leads to a processing-sensitive FO-ICR.
Similar papers
Coupling Current Control in Stabrite-Coated Nbti Rutherford Cables by Varying the Width of a Stainless Steel Core
similarity 0.91M. D. Sumption et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9911196
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of the electromechanical limits of high-performance NbSn Rutherford cables under transverse stress from a single-wire experiment
similarity 0.84Luc Gamperle et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1909.13543
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct measurement of inter-filament resistance in Nb3Sn multi-filamentary strands
similarity 0.82L. Muzzi & V. Corato · 2008 · arXiv:0812.4463
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of heat treatment excursion on critical current and residual resistivity ratio of ITER Nb3Sn strands
similarity 0.82J. Lu et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1701.08681
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
AC Losses of Copper Stabilized Multifilament YBCO Coated Conductors
similarity 0.81G. A. Levin et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1212.0452
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Contact resistivity due to oxide layers between two REBCO tapes
similarity 0.81Jun Lu et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.01515
Source status unknown — claims are unverified