Contact resistivity due to oxide layers between two REBCO tapes
Jun Lu, Yan Xin, Eric Lochner, Kyle Radcliff, Jeremy Levitan
arXiv:1912.01515 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ab714d · 2019-12-03 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In a no-insulation (NI) REBCO magnet, the turn-to-turn contact resistivity (Rc) determines its quench self-protection capability, charging delay time and the energy loss during field ramps. Therefore it is critically important to be able to control a range of Rc values suitable for various NI magnet coils. We used a commercial oxidizing agent Ebonol C to treat the copper surface of REBCO tapes. The copper oxide layer was characterized by cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The oxide layer formed in Ebonol C at 98 °C for 1 min is Cu2O of about 0.5 um. The Rc between two oxidized REBCO is in the order of 35 mOhm-cm2 at 4.2 K which decreases slowly with contact pressure cycles. The Rc increases but only slightly at 77 K. We also investigated the effect of oxidation of stainless steel co-wind tape on Rc. The native oxides on 316 stainless steel tape as well as those heated in air at 200 - 600 °C were examined by TEM and XPS. The native oxides layer is about 3 nm thick. After heating at 300 °C for 8 min and 600 °C for 1 min, its thickness increases to about 10 and 30 nm respectively. For the stainless steel tapes with about 10 nm surface oxides, pressure cycling for 30,000 cycles decreases Rc by almost 4 orders of magnitude. Whereas at 77 K, it only changes slightly. For a surface with 30 nm oxide, the Rc decreases moderately with load cycles. The results suggest that for an oxidized stainless steel to achieve stable Rc over large number of load cycles a relatively thick oxide film is needed.
Similar papers
Residual resistance ratio of Cu stabilizer in commercial REBCO tapes
similarity 0.87Jun Lu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.09919
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fast and accurate electromagnetic modeling of non-insulated and metal-insulated REBCO magnets
similarity 0.84Enric Pardo & Philippe Fazilleau · 2023 · arXiv:2309.02249
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
REBCO delamination by transverse electromagnetic stress due to screening current in magnetic field
similarity 0.83Jun Lu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.21301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of delamination in REBCO coated conductor by transmission electron microscopy
similarity 0.83Yan Xin et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.11556
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupling loss at the end connections of REBCO stacks: 2D modelling and measurement
similarity 0.83Shuo Li et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.02866
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of REBCO delamination in the resistive insulation nested coils
similarity 0.83Jun Lu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.16647
Source status unknown — claims are unverified