Residual resistance ratio of Cu stabilizer in commercial REBCO tapes
Jun Lu, Yan Xin, Vince Toplosky, Jeremy Levitan, Ke Han, Jane Wadhams, Munir Humayun, Dmytro Abraimov, Hongyu Bai
arXiv:2410.09919 · 2024-10-13
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Residual resistance ratio (RRR) of Cu stabilizer in REBCO coated conductor is an important design parameter for REBCO magnets. In this work, we measured RRR of electroplated Cu stabilizer in commercial REBCO tapes. Over 130 samples were measured for the quality assurance programs of REBCO magnet projects at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, USA (NHMFL). The average RRR value was above 50. In order to investigate the factors that influence RRR, several samples were analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy, secondary ion mass spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. We found that, in our samples, RRR was strongly correlated with the grain size. We demonstrated that RRR was primarily determined by grain boundary resistivity. Lower RRR was also strongly correlated with higher concentration of chlorine impurity. This is explained by that higher chlorine impurity hindered the grain growth in the room temperature self annealing process resulting smaller grain. Smaller grain resulted in lower RRR. In addition, thermal annealing significantly enhanced RRR. An activation energy of 0.4 eV was obtained from the annealing experiment which corresponds to the activation of Cu grain growth.
Similar papers
Contact resistivity due to oxide layers between two REBCO tapes
similarity 0.87Jun Lu et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.01515
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal conductivity of REBCO tapes with different stabilizers from 4.2 to 200 K
similarity 0.86Jun Lu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.09915
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-field thermal transport properties of REBCO coated conductors
similarity 0.85Marco Bonura & Carmine Senatore · 2014 · arXiv:1412.1328
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Control of turn-to-turn contact resistivity in resistively insulated REBCO coils
similarity 0.84Jun Lu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.15587
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
REBCO delamination characterization by 90 degree peel test
similarity 0.83Jun Lu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.09946
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quench Protection in Insulated REBCO Conductors: Design Optimization and Fast Detection via REBCO SQD
similarity 0.82Hajar Zgour et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2603.15244
Source status unknown — claims are unverified