REBCO delamination characterization by 90 degree peel test
Jun Lu, Jeremy Levitan, Aliya Hutley, Hongyu Bai
arXiv:2410.09946 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2024.3506492 · 2024-10-13 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
REBCO tape has successfully used in ultra-high field magnets. Mechanically, it is very strong in its length direction but is prone to delamination in the thickness direction. In an epoxy impregnated REBCO magnet, thermal strain alone could delaminate the conductor. Even for dry wound REBCO coil, a conductor with very low delamination strength is still a concern. Therefore, it is important to characterize the delamination strength of the conductor. In the past decade, significant progresses have been made in the characterization of REBCO delamination strength. Among several developed characterization methods, the 90 degree peel test is simple to setup and seems to offer reproducible results. Therefore, this test could be used as a reliable method to characterize the relative delamination strength of REBCO tapes for quality control purposes. This paper presents our development of 90 degree peel test method for quality assurance test of the 40 T all-superconducting magnet project at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory. We investigated the factors that influence the test results, such as thickness and RRR of the copper layer. We found that peel strength increases with decreasing Cu thickness. We also found that peel strength is positively correlated with RRR of the copper. Despite these effects, 90 degree peel test is still a valuable quality assurance tool to evaluate delamination strength for large volume of tapes with the same copper thickness.
Similar papers
REBCO delamination by transverse electromagnetic stress due to screening current in magnetic field
similarity 0.90Jun Lu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.21301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of REBCO delamination in the resistive insulation nested coils
similarity 0.87Jun Lu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.16647
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of delamination in REBCO coated conductor by transmission electron microscopy
similarity 0.85Yan Xin et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.11556
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Current Measurement of REBCO Cables by Using a Superconducting Transformer
similarity 0.83H. Yu et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.08979
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modelling the mechanics of 32 T REBCO superconductor magnet using numerical simulation
similarity 0.83Arpit Kumar Srivastava & Enric Pardo · 2024 · arXiv:2401.01266
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Residual resistance ratio of Cu stabilizer in commercial REBCO tapes
similarity 0.83Jun Lu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.09919
Source status unknown — claims are unverified