Superconducting properties of Y_xLu_(1-x)Ni2B2C and La3Ni2B2N3: A comparison between experiment and Eliashberg theory

S. Manalo; H. Michor; M. El-Hagary; G. Hilscher; E. Schachinger

← Back to search

Superconducting properties of Y_xLu_(1-x)Ni2B2C and La3Ni2B2N3: A comparison between experiment and Eliashberg theory

S. Manalo, H. Michor, M. El-Hagary, G. Hilscher, E. Schachinger

arXiv:cond-mat/9911305 · 1999-11-19 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T2experimental28 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Specific heat and resistivity measurements were performed on polycrystalline samples of the solid-solution Y_xLu_(1-x)Ni2B2C in order to determine thermodynamic properties such as the specific-heat difference, the thermodynamic critical field H_c(T), as well as the upper critical field H_{c2}(T). These properties were analyzed within the Eliashberg theory including anisotropy effects, yielding electron-phonon coupling anisotropy parameters <a_k^2> ranging beween 0.02 and 0.03 for the whole series, and Fermi velocity anisotropy parameters of <b_k^2> = 0.245-0.3. Excellent agreement between theory and experiment was achieved for these parameters, the Sommerfeld constant and model phonon spectra determined from specific heat measurements. An analysis of the previously investigated boronitride La3Ni2B2N3 for comparison revealed the electron-phonon anisotropy to be of great significance in describing its thermodynamic properties and the calculations yielded <a_k^2> \~ 0.08 and <b_k^2> ~ 0.245. The T_c-behavior within the series Y_xLu_(1-x)Ni2B2C is discussed in terms of coupling and impurity effects, and the density of states at the Fermi level N(0).

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
LuNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	16.01	Pressure not reported	unknown
LuNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	16.01	Pressure not reported	unknown
Y0.1Lu0.9Ni2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	15.56	Pressure not reported	unknown
Y0.1Lu0.9Ni2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	15.56	Pressure not reported	unknown
Y0.5Lu0.5Ni2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	14.9	Pressure not reported	unknown
Y0.5Lu0.5Ni2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	14.9	Pressure not reported	unknown
Y0.8Lu0.2Ni2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	14.68	Pressure not reported	unknown
Y0.8Lu0.2Ni2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	14.68	Pressure not reported	unknown
YNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	15.45	Pressure not reported	unknown
YNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	15.45	Pressure not reported	unknown
La3Ni2B2N3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	11.73	Pressure not reported	unknown