Quantum Otto cycle in a superconducting cavity in the nonadiabatic regime
Nicolás F. Del Grosso, Fernando C. Lombardo, Francisco D. Mazzitelli, Paula I. Villar
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022202 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the efficiency of the quantum Otto cycle applied to a superconducting cavity. We consider its description in terms of a full quantum scalar field in a one-dimensional cavity with a time-dependent boundary condition that can be externally controlled to perform and extract work unitarily from the system. We study the performance of this machine when acting as a heat engine as well as a refrigerator. It is shown that, in a nonadiabatic regime, the efficiency of the quantum cycle is affected by the dynamical Casimir effect that induces a sort of quantum friction that diminishes the efficiency. We also find regions of parameters where the effect is so strong that the machine can no longer function as an engine since the work that would be produced is completely consumed by the quantum friction. However, this effect can be avoided for some particular temporal evolutions of the boundary conditions that do not change the occupation number of the modes in the cavity, leading to a highly improved efficiency.
Similar papers
Nonlocal quantum heat engines made of hybrid superconducting devices
similarity 0.88S. Mojtaba Tabatabaei et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Efficiency of quasiparticle evacuation in superconducting devices
similarity 0.86Sukumar Rajauria et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
No-Go Theorem and Routes towards Cavity-Enhanced Superconductivity
similarity 0.85Qing-Dong Jiang · 2026 · arXiv:2608.14784
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Quantum Refrigerator: Breaking and Rejoining Cooper Pairs with Magnetic Field Cycles
similarity 0.85Sreenath K. Manikandan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum kinetics of a superconducting tunnel junction: Theory and comparison with experiment
similarity 0.84Kenneth S. Chow et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Fidelity Quantum Operations on Superconducting Qubits in the Presence of Noise
similarity 0.84Andrew J. Kerman & William D. Oliver
Source status unknown — claims are unverified