Thermal feedback in coaxial superconducting radio frequency cavities
Mattias McMullin, Philipp Kolb, Zhongyuan Yao, Robert Laxdal, Tobias Junginger
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.092001 · Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The surface resistance of superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities depends on the strength of the applied rf field. This field dependence is caused by a combination of intrinsic losses and the extrinsic thermal feedback (TFB) effect. To test theories of intrinsic field dependence, the extrinsic part must be compensated for when analyzing experimental data from SRF cavity tests. Performing this compensation requires knowing thermal parameters that describe heat flow in the cavity walls. The relevant thermal parameters have been measured in the case of superfluid helium, below 2.177 K, but no detailed measurements have yet been reported for cooling of niobium surfaces in normal fluid helium baths. Because of this, the impact of TFB on the field dependence at temperatures near 4.2 K is unknown. In the present study, we report measurements of normal fluid helium boiling from niobium surfaces and its dependence on the orientation of the boiling surface and bath temperature. These measurements are used to create a finite-element model of heat transfer in cavities from TRIUMF’s coaxial test program. This tool is then used to compensate for TFB when analyzing a range of datasets from this program. Results are presented showing that TFB has a weak impact for the temperatures of 2.0 and 4.2 K, where SRF cavities are usually operated, but it is an important effect at intermediate temperatures.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Understanding Quality Factor Degradation in Superconducting Niobium Cavities at Low Microwave Field Amplitudes
similarity 0.96A. Romanenko & D. I. Schuster
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal design studies in superconducting rf cavities: Phonon peak and Kapitza conductance
similarity 0.96A. Aizaz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Q operation of superconducting rf cavities: Potential impact of thermocurrents on the rf surface resistance
similarity 0.96J.-M. Vogt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor-semiconductor interaction effects in mesoscopic hybrid structures
similarity 0.96F. Rahman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting TESLA cavities
similarity 0.95B. Aune et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Search for Superscreening Effects in a Superconductor
similarity 0.95P. Ujić et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified