High-Q operation of superconducting rf cavities: Potential impact of thermocurrents on the rf surface resistance
J.-M. Vogt, O. Kugeler, J. Knobloch
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.18.042001 · Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
For many new accelerator applications, superconducting radio frequency systems are the enabling technology. In particular for CW applications, much effort is being expended to minimize the power dissipation (surface resistance) of niobium cavities. Starting in 2009, we suggested a means of reducing the residual resistance by performing a thermal cycle [O. Kugeler et al., in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on RF Superconductivity (2009), p. 352], a procedure of warming up a cavity after initial cooldown to about 20 K and cooling it down again. In subsequent studies [J. M. Vogt, O. Kugeler, and J. Knobloch, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 102002 (2013)], this technique was used to manipulate the residual resistance by more than a factor of 2. It was postulated that thermocurrents during cooldown generate additional trapped magnetic flux that impacts the cavity quality factor. Here, we present a more extensive study that includes measurements of two additional passband modes and that confirms the effect. In this paper, we also discuss simulations that support the claim. While the layout of the cavity LHe tank system is cylindrically symmetric, we show that the temperature dependence of the material parameters results in a nonsymmetric current distribution. Hence a significant amount of magnetic flux can be generated at the rf surface.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.2 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Flux expulsion in niobium superconducting radio-frequency cavities of different purity and essential contributions to the flux sensitivity
similarity 0.96P. Dhakal et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field emission mitigation studies in the SLAC Linac Coherent Light Source II superconducting rf cavities via in situ plasma processing
similarity 0.96Bianca Giaccone et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal feedback in coaxial superconducting radio frequency cavities
similarity 0.96Mattias McMullin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of vortex hotspots on the radio-frequency surface resistance of superconductors
similarity 0.95A. Gurevich & G. Ciovati
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic hysteresis effects in superconducting coplanar microwave resonators
similarity 0.95D. Bothner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of cool-down conditions at Tc on the superconducting rf cavity quality factor
similarity 0.95J.-M. Vogt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified