Impact of cool-down conditions at Tc on the superconducting rf cavity quality factor
J.-M. Vogt, O. Kugeler, J. Knobloch
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.102002 · Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Many next-generation, high-gradient accelerator applications, from energy-recovery linacs to accelerator-driven systems (ADS) rely on continuous wave (CW) operation for which superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) systems are the enabling technology. However, while SRF cavities dissipate little power, they must be cooled by liquid helium and for many CW accelerators the complexity as well as the investment and operating costs of the cryoplant can prove to be prohibitive. We investigated ways to reduce the dynamic losses by improving the residual resistance (Rres) of niobium cavities. Both the material treatment and the magnetic shielding are known to have an impact. In addition, we found that Rres can be reduced significantly when the cool-down conditions during the superconducting phase transition of the niobium are optimized. We believe that not only do the cool-down conditions impact the level to which external magnetic flux is trapped in the cavity but also that thermoelectric currents are generated which in turn create additional flux that can be trapped. Therefore, we investigated the generation of flux and the dynamics of flux trapping and release in a simple model niobium-titanium system that mimics an SRF cavity in its helium tank. We indeed found that thermal gradients along the system during the superconducting transition can generate a thermoelectric current and magnetic flux, which subsequently can be trapped. These effects may explain the observed variation of the cavity’s Rres with cool-down conditions.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.2 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
High-Q operation of superconducting rf cavities: Potential impact of thermocurrents on the rf surface resistance
similarity 0.98J.-M. Vogt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux expulsion in niobium superconducting radio-frequency cavities of different purity and essential contributions to the flux sensitivity
similarity 0.96P. Dhakal et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Understanding Quality Factor Degradation in Superconducting Niobium Cavities at Low Microwave Field Amplitudes
similarity 0.95A. Romanenko & D. I. Schuster
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reduction of Dissipative Nonlinear Conductivity of Superconductors by Static and Microwave Magnetic Fields
similarity 0.95A. Gurevich
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal design studies in superconducting rf cavities: Phonon peak and Kapitza conductance
similarity 0.95A. Aizaz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic hysteresis effects in superconducting coplanar microwave resonators
similarity 0.94D. Bothner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified