Activation Energies in MoSi/Al Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors
D. Salvoni, M. Ejrnaes, A. Gaggero, F. Mattioli, F. Martini, H.G. Ahmad, L. Di Palma, R. Satariano, X.Y. Yang, L. You, F. Tafuri, G.P. Pepe, D. Massarotti, D. Montemurro, L. Parlato
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.014006 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) are receiving the interest of the scientific and industrial communities due to their unparallel high performances in the infrared. However, even though the fabrication process permits the achievement of about 98% efficiency and less than 1 cps dark-count rate, the physical mechanism inducing the detection remains unclear. It is clear however that normal core vortices play a crucial role. In this work we investigate the role of vortices in two-dimensional (2D) molybdenum silicide SNSPDs of different widths covered with an Al layer through the analysis of the switching current distributions from the superconducting to resistive regime, in a wide interval of temperatures from 4.5 K down to 10 mK. This analysis provides the energy scales of different mechanisms that are responsible for fluctuations and dark counts in SNSPDs. We consider two models based on vortices, the unbinding of vortex-antivortex pairs (VAPs) and vortices hopping over the edge barrier (VH) and we underline the differences among different devices made by different materials. We also estimate the energy scales of similar Nb−Ti−N and NbN devices and compare the results. The lower activation energies obtained for MoSi/Al devices, explain the peculiarity of this material to work at longer wavelengths with a higher quantum detection efficiency.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo0.70Si0.30 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoSi/Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoSi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoSi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Mo-Si superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors on GaAs
similarity 0.95M. Erbe et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct detection of the ≈8.4eV internal conversion energy of Th229m embedded in a superconducting nanowire
similarity 0.94Galen O'Neil et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong suppression of the resistivity near the superconducting transition in narrow microbridges in external magnetic fields
similarity 0.93Xiaofu Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electric-Field-Induced Electronic Instability in Amorphous Mo3Si Superconducting Films
similarity 0.92A. V. Samoilov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle energy relaxation in the cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.92S. G. Doettinger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron localization effects on the low-temperature high-field magnetoresistivity of three-dimensional amorphous superconductors
similarity 0.92A. V. Samoilov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified