Argon-Milling-Induced Decoherence Mechanisms in Superconducting Quantum Circuits
J. Van Damme, Ts. Ivanov, P. Favia, T. Conard, J. Verjauw, R. Acharya, D. Perez Lozano, B. Raes, J. Van de Vondel, A.M. Vadiraj, M. Mongillo, D. Wan, J. De Boeck, A. Potočnik, K. De Greve
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.014034 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The fabrication of superconducting circuits requires multiple deposition, etching, and cleaning steps, each possibly introducing material property changes and microscopic defects. In this work, we specifically investigate the process of argon milling, a potentially coherence-limiting step, using niobium and aluminum superconducting resonators as a proxy for the surface-limited behavior of qubits. We find that niobium microwave resonators exhibit an order of magnitude decrease in quality factors after surface argon milling, while aluminum resonators are resilient to the same process. Extensive analysis of the niobium surface shows no change in the suboxide composition due to argon milling, while two-tone spectroscopy measurements reveal an increase in two-level system electrical dipole moments, indicating a structurally altered niobium oxide. However, a short dry etch can fully recover the argon-milling-induced losses on niobium, offering a potential route towards state-of-the-art overlap Josephson junction qubits with niobium circuitry.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Suppression of Cooper-pair tunneling in superconducting charge boxes in tunable electromagnetic environments
similarity 0.94Watson Kuo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Improving Superconducting Resonators in Magnetic Fields by Reduced Field Focussing and Engineered Flux Screening
similarity 0.94D. Bothner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Properties of superconducting planar resonators at millikelvin temperatures
similarity 0.94T. Lindström et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Efficiency of quasiparticle evacuation in superconducting devices
similarity 0.94Sukumar Rajauria et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Origin and Reduction of 1/f Magnetic Flux Noise in Superconducting Devices
similarity 0.94P. Kumar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detecting parity effect in a superconducting device in the presence of parity switches
similarity 0.94E. T. Mannila et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified