← Back to search

Superconductivity in Ru-doped CuIr2Te4 telluride chalcogenide

Dong Yan, Lingyong Zeng, Yishi Lin, Junjie Yin, Yuan He, Xing Zhang, Meiling Huang, Bing Shen, Meng Wang, Yihua Wang, Daoxin Yao, Huixia Luo

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.174504 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Here we report the effect of structural and superconductivity properties on Ru-doped CuIr2Te4 telluride chalcogenide. X-ray diffraction results suggest that CuIr2−xRuxTe4 maintains the disordered trigonal structure with space group P3¯m1 (no. 164) for x ≤ 0.3. The lattice constants, a and c, both decrease with increasing Ru content. Temperature-dependent resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and specific heat measurements are performed to characterize the superconducting properties systematically. Our results suggest that the optimal doping level for superconductivity in CuIr2−xRuxTe4 is x=0.05, where Tc is 2.79 K with the Sommerfeld constant γ of 11.52mJmol−1K−2, and the specific heat anomaly at the superconducting transition, ΔC/γTc, is approximately 1.51, which is slightly higher than the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer value of 1.43 and demonstrates bulk superconductivity in our CuIr1.95Ru0.05Te4 compound. The values of the lower {Hc1(0)} and upper {Hc2(0)} critical field calculated from isothermal magnetization {M(H)} and magnetotransport {ρ(T,H)} measurements are 0.98 and 2.47 kOe, respectively, signifying that the compound is clearly a type-II superconductor. Finally, a “domelike” shape superconducting transition temperature (Tc) vs x content phase diagram has been established. A low substitution (x=0.03) of Ru for Ir leads to the disappearance of the charge density wave transition, while Tc rises and reaches a maximum value of 2.79 K at x=0.05, followed by a decrease of Tc as x increases. This feature of the competition between the charge density wave we have established and the superconductivity could be caused by tuning the Fermi surface and density of states with Ru chemical doping.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CuIr2-xRuxTe4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.79Pressure not reportedmidpoint
CuIr2-xRuxTe4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.79Pressure not reportedonset
CuIr1.95Ru0.05Te4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.79Pressure not reportedunknown
CuIr2Te4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.5Pressure not reportedunknown
CuRh2S4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.35Pressure not reportedunknown
CuRh2Se4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.5Pressure not reportedunknown
CuV2S4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.45Pressure not reportedunknown
Cu1-xZnxIr2S4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.4Pressure not reportedunknown
Cu(Ir1-xPtx)2Se4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.76Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers