Superconductivity in the Ru-Doped CuIr2Te4 Telluride Chalcogenide
Dong Yan, Lingyong Zeng, Yishi Lin, Junjie Yin, Yuan He, Xing Zhang, Meiling Huang, Meng Wang, Yihua Wang, Daoin Yao, Huixia Luo
arXiv:1908.09292 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.174504 · 2019-08-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Here we report the effect of structural and superconductivity properties on Ru doped CuIr2Te4 telluride chalcogenide. XRD results suggest that the CuIr2-xRuxTe4 maintain the disordered trigonal structure with space group P3m1 (No. 164) for x less than 0.3. The lattice constants, a and c, both decrease with increasing Ru content. Temperature-dependent resistivity, magnetic susceptibility and specific-heat measurements are performed to characterize the superconducting properties systematically. Our results suggest that the optimal doping level for superconductivity in CuIr2-xRuxTe4 is x = 0.05, where Tc is 2.79 K with the Sommerfeld constant gamma of 11.52 mJ mol-1 K-2 and the specific-heat anomaly at the superconducting transition, is approximately 1.51, which is higher than the BCS value of 1.43, indicating CuIr1.95Ru0.05Te4 is a strongly electron-phonon coupled superconductor. The values of lower critical filed and upper critical field calculated from isothermal magnetization and magneto-transport measurements are 0.98 KOe and 2.47 KOe respectively, signifying that the compound is clearly a type-II superconductor. Finally, a dome-like shape superconducting Tcs vs. x content phase diagram is established, where the charge density wave disappears at x = 0.03 while superconducting transition temperature (Tc) rises until it reaches its peak at x = 0.05, then, with decreasing when x reaches 0.3. This feature of the competition between CDW and the superconductivity could be caused by tuning the Fermi surface and density of states with Ru chemical doping.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuIr1.95Ru0.05Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.79 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuIr1.95Ru0.05Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.79 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuIr1.95Ru0.05Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.79 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in Ru-doped CuIr2Te4 telluride chalcogenide
similarity 0.93Dong Yan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in CuIr2-xAlxTe4 telluride chalcogenides
similarity 0.92Dong Yan et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.11615
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting dome associated with the suppression and re-emergence of charge density wave states upon sulfur substitution in CuIr2Te4 chalcogenides
similarity 0.91Mebrouka Boubeche et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.05817
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between Charge-Density-Wave, Superconductivity, and Ferromagnetism in CuIr2-xCrxTe4 Chalcogenides
similarity 0.91Lingyong Zeng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.04599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superconductivity with possible re-appearance of charge density wave states in polycrystalline CuAgIrTe alloys
similarity 0.90Mebrouka Boubeche et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.04676
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of unconventional pairing in the quasi two-dimensional CuIrTe superconductor
similarity 0.90T. Shang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.07070
Source status unknown — claims are unverified