Thermopower across the phase diagram of the cuprate La1.6−xNd0.4SrxCuO4: Signatures of the pseudogap and charge density wave phases
C. Collignon, A. Ataei, A. Gourgout, S. Badoux, M. Lizaire, A. Legros, S. Licciardello, S. Wiedmann, J.-Q. Yan, J.-S. Zhou, Q. Ma, B. D. Gaulin, Nicolas Doiron-Leyraud, Louis Taillefer
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.155102 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Seebeck coefficient (thermopower) S of the cuprate superconductor La1.6−xNd0.4SrxCuO4 was measured across its doping phase diagram (from p=0.12 to p=0.25), at various temperatures down to T≃2 K, in the normal state accessed by suppressing superconductivity with a magnetic field up to H=37.5 T. The magnitude of S/T in the T=0 limit is found to suddenly increase, by a factor ≃5, when the doping is reduced below p★=0.23, the critical doping for the onset of the pseudogap phase. This confirms that the pseudogap phase causes a large reduction of the carrier density n, consistent with a drop from n=1+p above p★ to n=p below p★, as previously inferred from measurements of the Hall coefficient, resistivity, and thermal conductivity. When the doping is reduced below p=0.19, a qualitative change is observed whereby S/T decreases as T→0, eventually to reach negative values at T=0. In prior work on other cuprates, negative values of S/T at T→0 were shown to result from a reconstruction of the Fermi surface caused by charge density wave (CDW) order. We therefore identify pCDW≃0.19 as the critical doping beyond which there is no CDW-induced Fermi surface reconstruction. The fact that pCDW is well separated from p★ reveals that there is a doping range below p★ where the transport signatures of the pseudogap phase are unaffected by CDW correlations, as previously found in YBa2Cu3Oy and La2−xSrxCuO4.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.6-xNd0.4SrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| La1.6-xNd0.4SrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| La1.6-xNd0.4SrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Materials preparation, single-crystal growth, and the phase diagram of the cuprate high-temperature superconductor La1.6−xNd0.4SrxCuO4
similarity 0.95Mirela Dragomir et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-Temperature Electronic Heat Transport in La2−xSrxCuO4 Single Crystals: Unusual Low-Energy Physics in the Normal and Superconducting States
similarity 0.94J. Takeya et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Doping for the Onset of Fermi-Surface Reconstruction by Charge-Density-Wave Order in the Cuprate Superconductor La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.94S. Badoux et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi-surface transformation across the pseudogap critical point of the cuprate superconductor La1.6−xNd0.4SrxCuO4
similarity 0.94C. Collignon et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of next-nearest-neighbor hopping t′ on the electronic structure of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.94K. Tanaka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of plasmon excitations across the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductor La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.93M. Hepting et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified