← Back to search

Enhancement of superconductivity and its relation to lattice expansion in InxTe (0.84≤x≤1)

M. Kriener, M. S. Bahramy, Y. Tokura, Y. Taguchi

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.134519 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The quest to govern the driving forces behind superconductivity and gain control over the superconducting transition temperature Tc is as old as the phenomenon itself. Microscopically, this requires a proper understanding of the evolution of electron-lattice interactions in their parameter space. We report such a controlled study on Tc in InxTe via fine-tuning the In stoichiometry x. We find that increasing x from 0.84 to 1 results in an enhancement of Tc from 1.3 K to 3.5 K accompanied by an increase of the electron-phonon coupling constant from 0.45 to 0.63. Employing first-principles calculations, we show that this behavior is driven by two factors, each taking the dominant role depending on x. For x≲0.92, the major role is played by the density of electronic states at the Fermi level. Above x∼0.92, the change in the density of states flattens while the enhancement of Tc continues. We attribute this to a systematic softening of lattice vibrations, amplifying the electron-phonon coupling, and hence, Tc.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
InxTe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.3Pressure unresolvedunknown
InxTe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.5Pressure unresolvedunknown
InTe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers