Reply to ‘‘Noise effect on instabilities and chaotic solutions of a superconducting interferometer.’’
J. A. Ketoja, J. Kurkijärvi, T. Ryhänen, H. Seppä
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.404 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
It is argued on the basis of computer simulations that points with multiple modes in the dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) dynamics should be avoided as operating points of a flux detector.
Similar papers
Superconducting qubit manipulated by fast pulses: experimental observation of distinct decoherence regimes
similarity 0.87F. Chiarello et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.1508
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise of a superconducting magnetic flux sensor based on a proximity Josephson junction
similarity 0.85R. N. Jabdaraghi et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.06448
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise Performance of Lumped Element Direct Current Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Amplifiers in the 4 GHz-8 GHz Range
similarity 0.84Lafe Spietz et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.4673
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intermode Dephasing in a Superconducting Stripline Resonator
similarity 0.84Oren Suchoi et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0901.3110
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Terraced Scanning Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Susceptometer with Sub-Micron Pickup Loops
similarity 0.84Nicholas C. Koshnick et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0901.0308
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hysteresis and intermittency in a nano-bridge based suspended DC-SQUID
similarity 0.84Segev, Eran et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.4391
Source status unknown — claims are unverified