A Terraced Scanning Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Susceptometer with Sub-Micron Pickup Loops
Nicholas C. Koshnick, Martin E. Huber, Julie A. Bert, Clifford W. Hicks, Jeff Large, Hal Edwards, Kathryn A. Moler
arXiv:0901.0308 · DOI 10.1063/1.3046098 · 2009-01-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs) can have excellent spin sensitivity depending on their magnetic flux noise, pick-up loop diameter, and distance from the sample. We report a family of scanning SQUID susceptometers with terraced tips that position the pick-up loops 300 nm from the sample. The 600 nm - 2 um pickup loops, defined by focused ion beam, are integrated into a 12-layer optical lithography process allowing flux-locked feedback, in situ background subtraction and optimized flux noise. These features enable a sensitivity of ~70 electron spins per root Hertz at 4K.
Similar papers
Scanning nano-SQUID with single electron spin sensitivity
similarity 0.92Denis Vasyukov et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.0694
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrically tunable multi-terminal SQUID-on-tip
similarity 0.92Uri, Aviram et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1606.05088
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
3D nano-bridge-based SQUID susceptometers for scanning magnetic imaging of quantum materials
similarity 0.92Y. P. Pan et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.11262
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spatial resolution
similarity 0.91John R. Kirtley et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.09483
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic, Thermal, and Topographic Imaging with a Nanometer-Scale SQUID-On-Lever Scanning Probe
similarity 0.91M. Wyss et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier
similarity 0.91M. Hatridge et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified