Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spatial resolution
John R. Kirtley, Lisa Paulius, Aaron J. Rosenberg, Johanna C. Palmstrom, Connor M. Holland, Eric M. Spanton, Daniel Schiessl, Colin L. Jermain, Jonathan Gibbons, Y. -K. -K. Fung, Martin E. Huber, Daniel C. Ralph, Mark B. Ketchen, Gerald W. Gibson, Kathryn A. Moler
arXiv:1605.09483 · DOI 10.1063/1.4961982 · 2016-05-31 · The Review of scientific instruments
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID) microscopy has excellent magnetic field sensitivity, but suffers from modest spatial resolution when compared with other scanning probes. This spatial resolution is determined by both the size of the field sensitive area and the spacing between this area and the sample surface. In this paper we describe scanning SQUID susceptometers that achieve sub-micron spatial resolution while retaining a white noise floor flux sensitivity of $\approx 2μΦ_0/Hz^{1/2}$. This high spatial resolution is accomplished by deep sub-micron feature sizes, well shielded pickup loops fabricated using a planarized process, and a deep etch step that minimizes the spacing between the sample surface and the SQUID pickup loop. We describe the design, modeling, fabrication, and testing of these sensors. Although sub-micron spatial resolution has been achieved previously in scanning SQUID sensors, our sensors not only achieve high spatial resolution, but also have integrated modulation coils for flux feedback, integrated field coils for susceptibility measurements, and batch processing. They are therefore a generally applicable tool for imaging sample magnetization, currents, and susceptibilities with higher spatial resolution than previous susceptometers.
Similar papers
Meissner response of a bulk superconductor with an embedded sheet of reduced penetration depth
similarity 0.89J. R. Kirtley et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.1032
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging anisotropic vortex dynamics in FeSe
similarity 0.89Irene P. Zhang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.11542
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner response of superconductors with inhomogeneous penetration depths
similarity 0.89V. G. Kogan & J. R. Kirtley · 2011 · arXiv:1103.4553
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A dispersive nanoSQUID magnetometer for ultra-low noise, high bandwidth flux detection
similarity 0.88E. M. Levenson-Falk et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1301.3184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of the signatures of sub-resolution defects in two-dimensional superconductors with scanning SQUID
similarity 0.88Hilary Noad et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.00617
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of resonances on the noise performance of SQUID susceptometers
similarity 0.88Samantha I Davis et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.03836
Source status unknown — claims are unverified