Transport and magnetic properties of the (Eu,Ce)2(Ba,Eu)2Cu3O9−δ-type and T*-type superconductors: Dependence of Tc on the size of the rare-earth ion
S. Ikegawa, T. Wada, T. Yamashita, H. Yamauchi, S. Tanaka
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.5659 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The electrical transport properties and magnetic susceptibility of (L2/3Ce1/3)2(La1/3Ba1/3Sr1/3)2 Cu3O9−δ (2:2:3 phase) where L is a rare-earth element are measured and compared with those of the T* phase (Nd1.4Ce0.2Sr0.4Cu1−xZnxO4−δ and La1.8−xLxSr0.2CuO4−δ) in order to investigate why the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) depends on the ionic radius of the atom L. For 2:2:3 samples with L=Eu, Dy, Y, or Ho, the smaller the size of the L3+ ion, the lower is the value of Tc, while the Hall coefficient (RH) remains at the same level at temperatures above 130 K. This is in contrast to the case of La1.8−xLxSr0.2CuO4−δ with L=Sm, Eu, or Gd, in which the decrease in Tc with decreasing ionic radius of the L atom may be attributed to the reduction in the carrier concentration. The resistivity, RH, and Seebeck coefficient for a nonsuperconducting 2:2:3 sample containing small L3+ ions are all parallel to those of a nonsuperconducting T*-phase sample with Zn doping. Judging from these experimental results, we suggest that a ‘‘disordered potential’’ similar to the case of the Zn-doped T*-phase compound exists in the nonsuperconducting 2:2:3 compound.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Eu2/3Ce1/3)2(La1/3Ba1/3Sr1/3)2Cu3O9-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| (Dy2/3Ce1/3)2(La1/3Ba1/3Sr1/3)2Cu3O9-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.4Ce0.2Sr0.4CuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23.1 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La0.8SmSr0.2CuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 21 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La0.9Eu0.9Sr0.2CuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Thermoelectric power of the (Eu,Ce)4(Ba,Eu)4Cu6Oy phase and the T* phase: Comparison between superconducting and nonsuperconducting compounds
similarity 0.95S. Ikegawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specific heat and magnetic susceptibility of superconducting and semiconducting Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4−δ
similarity 0.94S. J. Collocott et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting-plasma resonance along the c axis in various copper oxide superconductors
similarity 0.94H. Shibata & T. Yamada
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Lattice Instabilities in Cuprate Superconductors: A Possible Limiting Mechanism for Tc
similarity 0.94M. Lang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Relationship between the lattice parameter and superconductivity in the 2-1-4 series n-type cuprates
similarity 0.94Cong Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diamagnetism, Nernst signal, and finite-size effects in superconductors above the transition temperature Tc
similarity 0.94T. Schneider & S. Weyeneth
Source status unknown — claims are unverified