Transition from metallic to tunneling-type conductance in metal-metal and normal-metal–superconductor point contacts
H. Srikanth, A. K. Raychaudhuri
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.14713 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have investigated the microshort–to–tunneling crossover in normal-normal (N-N) and normal-metal–superconductor (N-S) point-contact junctions at 4.2 K as the junction conductance (G0) is varied. The microshort (or ‘‘metallic’’) point contact with the dynamic conductance G (V) having a negative derivative with respect to bias V (i.e., ∂G/∂V<0) changes over to a tunneling-type junction with ∂G/∂V>0 when G0≃3–5 mS. We show that this is the region where the contact radius α is a few times kF−1 (kF is the Fermi wave vector) and the crossover in the sign of ∂G/∂V occurs due to electron confinement in a length scale comparable to kF−1. The effect of confinement is to make the electrons crossing the constriction evanescent in nature as the junction size is reduced progressively and the energy for lateral confinement becomes comparable to EF. We argue that in this extreme ballistic regime, the classical Sharvin approach breaks down as quantum effects due to electron confinement takes over. This happens much before ‘‘single-atom’’ contact is reached which signals the onset of vacuum tunneling. As a further test of the electron confinement effects in point contacts, we investigated clean N-S microshorts showing near-ideal Andreev reflection. We find that in N-S junctions, the Andreev reflection (which is a manifestation of superconductivity) gradually vanishes when the contact radius α≃0.1ξ (ξ is the coherence length) and the energy cost of electron confinement is larger than the superconducting energy gap Δ.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nonballistic transport characteristics of superconducting point contacts
similarity 0.96Ritesh Kumar & Goutam Sheet
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Depinning Transition in Type-II Superconductors
similarity 0.95N. Lütke-Entrup et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Dependent Transparency of Ferromagnet/Superconductor Interfaces
similarity 0.95K. Xia et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron tunneling through a hybrid superconducting-normal mesoscopic junction under microwave radiation
similarity 0.94Argo Nurbawono et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conductance oscillation of a mesoscopic normal metal spanning unconventional and conventional superconductors
similarity 0.94Junren Shi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
First-order phase transitions in ferromagnet/superconductor layered structures
similarity 0.94Paul H. Barsic et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified