Reply to “Comment on ‘Intrinsic resistance fluctuations in mesoscopic superconducting wires’ ”
V. V. Moshchalkov, L. Gielen, G. Neuttiens, C. Van Haesendonck, Y. Bruynseraede
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.6352 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We show that several essential assumptions used by Landau and Rinderer (see the preceding Comment) are in contradiction with available experimental data on mesoscopic superconducting wires. Therefore their model cannot be used for the interpretation of the anomalous R(T) behavior in these samples.
Similar papers
Intrinsic resistance fluctuations in mesoscopic superconducting wires
similarity 0.90V. V. Moshchalkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples”
similarity 0.89S. G. den Hartog & B. J. van Wees
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to "Comment on 'Apical charge flux-modulated in-plane transport properties of cuprate superconductors'"
similarity 0.87Xin Li et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.03992
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultrathin Superconducting Wires”
similarity 0.85Ji-Min Duan
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum fluctuations and phase coherence in superconducting nanowires
similarity 0.84Alexey Radkevich et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous mesoscopic kinetics in disordered superconductors
similarity 0.84Mengling Hettinger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified