← Back to search

Fluctuations, dissipation, and nonuniversal superfluid jumps in two-dimensional superconductors

R. W. Crane, N. P. Armitage, A. Johansson, G. Sambandamurthy, D. Shahar, G. Grüner

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.094506 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report a comprehensive study of the complex ac conductivity of thin effectively two-dimensional amorphous superconducting InOx films at zero applied field. Below a temperature scale Tc0 where the superconducting order parameter amplitude becomes well defined, there is a temperature where both the generalized superfluid stiffness acquires a frequency dependence and the dc magnetoresistance becomes linear in field. We associate this with a transition of the Kosterlitz-Thouless-Berezinskii (KTB) type. At our measurement frequencies the superfluid stiffness at TKTB is found to be larger than the universal value. Although this may be understood with a vortex dielectric constant of ϵv≈1.9 within the usual KTB theory, this is a relatively large value and indicates that such a system may be out of the domain of applicability of the low-fugacity (low-vortex-density) KTB treatment. This opens up the possibility that at least some of the discrepancy from a nonuniversal magnitude is intrinsic. Our finite-frequency measurements allow us access to a number of other phenomena concerning the charge dynamics in superconducting thin films, including an enhanced conductivity near the amplitude fluctuation temperature Tc0 and a finite dissipation at low temperature which appears to be a universal aspect of highly disordered superconducting films.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
InOx

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.28Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers