Proximity effects and nonequilibrium superconductivity in transition-edge sensors
John E. Sadleir, Stephen J. Smith, Ian K. Robinson, Fred M. Finkbeiner, James A. Chervenak, Simon R. Bandler, Megan E. Eckart, Caroline A. Kilbourne
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.184502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have recently shown that normal-metal/superconductor (N/S) bilayer superconducting transition-edge sensors (TESs) exhibit weak-link behavior.1 Here, we extend our understanding to include TESs with added noise-mitigating normal-metal structures (N structures). We find that TESs with added Au structures also exhibit weak-link behavior as evidenced by the exponential temperature dependence of the critical current and Josephson-like oscillations of the critical current with applied magnetic field. We explain our results in terms of an effect converse to the longitudinal proximity effect (LoPE),1 the lateral inverse proximity effect (LaiPE), for which the order parameter in the N/S bilayer is reduced due to the neighboring N structures. Resistance and critical current measurements are presented as a function of temperature and magnetic field taken on square Mo/Au bilayer TESs with lengths ranging from 8 to 130 μm with and without added N structures. We observe the inverse proximity effect on the bilayer over in-plane distances many tens of microns and find the transition shifts to lower temperatures scale approximately as the inverse square of the in-plane N-structure separation distance, without appreciable broadening of the transition width. We also present evidence for nonequilbrium superconductivity and estimate a quasiparticle lifetime of 1.8×10−10 s for the bilayer. The LoPE model is also used to explain the increased conductivity at temperatures above the bilayer’s steep resistive transition.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo/Au Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo/Au Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.17 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo/Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo/Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Longitudinal Proximity Effects in Superconducting Transition-Edge Sensors
similarity 0.96John E. Sadleir et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous behavior of the superconducting critical temperature of Mo-V superlattices
similarity 0.95J.-M. Triscone et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous magnetoresistance near the superconductor-insulator transition in ultrathin films of a−MoxSi1−x
similarity 0.94S. Okuma et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong electron-phonon coupling in the intermetallic superconductor Mo8Ga41
similarity 0.91Valeriy Yu. Verchenko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible unconventional two-band superconductivity in MoTe2
similarity 0.91Jiawei Luo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of screening and superconductivity in low-dimensional materials
similarity 0.91G. Schönhoff et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified