Anomalous hysteresis as evidence for a magnetic-field-induced chiral superconducting state in LiFeAs
G. Li, R. R. Urbano, P. Goswami, C. Tarantini, B. Lv, P. Kuhns, A. P. Reyes, C. W. Chu, L. Balicas
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.024512 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Magnetometry measurements in high-quality LiFeAs single crystals reveal a change in the sign of the magnetic hysteresis in the vicinity of the upper critical field Hc2, from a clear diamagnetic response dominated by the pinning of vortices to a considerably smaller net hysteretic response of opposite sign, which disappears at Hc2. If the diamagnetic response at high fields results from pinned vortices and associated screening supercurrents, this sign change must result from currents circulating in the opposite sense, which give rise to a small field-dependent magnetic moment below Hc2. This behavior seems to be extremely sensitive to the sample quality or stoichiometry, as we have observed it only in a few fresh crystals, which also display the de Haas van Alphen effect. We provide arguments against the surface superconductivity, the flux compression, and the random π junction scenarios, which have been previously put forward to explain a paramagnetic Meissner effect, below the lower critical field Hc1. The observed anomalous hysteresis at high fields will be compatible with the existence of chiral gap wave functions, which possess a field-dependent magnetic moment. Within a Landau-Ginzburg framework, we demonstrate how a (dx2−y2+idxy) or a (px+ipy) chiral superconducting component can be stabilized in the mixed state of s± superconductor, due to the combined effects of the magnetic field and the presence of competing pairing channels. The realization of a particular chiral pairing depends on the microscopic details of the strengths of the competing pairing channels.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.1 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Sign inversion in the superconducting order parameter of LiFeAs inferred from Bogoliubov quasiparticle interference
similarity 0.95Shun Chi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity from repulsion in LiFeAs: Novel s-wave symmetry and potential time-reversal symmetry breaking
similarity 0.95F. Ahn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of iron-site defects on superconductivity in LiFeAs
similarity 0.95Shun Chi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crystal, spin, and electronic structure of the superconductor LiFeAs
similarity 0.95Zhi Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NMR evidence of strongly correlated superconductivity in LiFeAs: Tuning toward a spin-density-wave ordering
similarity 0.95L. Ma et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal versus Nodeless Behaviors of the Order Parameters of LiFeP and LiFeAs Superconductors from Magnetic Penetration-Depth Measurements
similarity 0.95K. Hashimoto et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified