← Back to search

Modifications of the Meissner screening profile in YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films by gold nanoparticles

E. Stilp, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, E. Morenzoni, H. Keller, C. Katzer, F. Schmidl, M. Döbeli

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.020510 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Adding Au nanoparticles to YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films leads to an increase of the superconducting transition temperature Tc and the critical current density jc. While the higher jc can be understood in terms of a stronger pinning of the flux vortices at the Au nanoparticles, the enhanced Tc is still puzzling. In the present study, we determined the microscopic magnetic penetration profiles and the corresponding London penetration depths λL in the Meissner state of optimally doped YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films with and without Au nanoparticles by low-energy muon spin rotation. By Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, we show that the Au nanoparitcles are distributed over the whole thickness of the thin-film samples. The superfluid density ns∝1/λL2 was found to increase in the films containing Au nanoparticles. We attribute this increase of ns to a reduction of the defect density possibly due to defect condensation at the Au nanoparticles.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90.2Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90.8Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

94.1Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers