Berry phase in cuprate superconductors
N. Doiron-Leyraud, T. Szkopek, T. Pereg-Barnea, C. Proust, G. Gervais
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.245136 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The geometrical Berry phase is widely recognized as having profound implications for the properties of electronic systems. Over the last decade or so, the Berry phase has been essential to our understanding of new materials such as graphene and topological insulators. In general, a nontrivial Berry phase is a result of band crossing as in the case of a massless Dirac point. The Berry phase can be accessed in quantum oscillation measurements as it contributes to the phase mismatch of electrons in their cyclotron orbits. With their enigmatic pseudogap and superconducting phases, the cuprates are materials where the Berry phase is thus far unknown. Based on quantum oscillation data in the high-field normal state of underdoped cuprates, we determined the Berry phase contribution to the phase mismatch unambiguously in this family of materials. In the hole-doped materials YBa2Cu3Oy, YBa2Cu4O8, and HgBa2CuO4+δ, a trivial Berry phase of 0 mod(2π) is systematically observed, while the electron-doped Nd2−xCexCuO4 exhibits a significant nonzero Berry phase of 1.4π. Our results set significant constraints on the microscopic description of the high-field normal state and, in particular, do not support a nodal structure or broken time-reversal symmetry in the hole-doped compounds.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu4O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| HgBa2CuO4+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Electronic Inhomogeneity and Breakdown of the Universal Thermal Conductivity of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.96X. F. Sun et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Testing the relation of a spin gap to superconductivity in the copper oxides
similarity 0.95J.-S. Zhou & J. B. Goodenough
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of the Hall Coefficient and the Peculiar Electronic Structure of the Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.95Yoichi Ando et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear ac Resistivity in s-Wave and d-Wave Disordered Granular Superconductors
similarity 0.95Mai Suan Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of scattering rate for linear-in-temperature resistivity in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.95Mingyang Qin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large Hall angle of vortex motion in high-Tc cuprate superconductors revealed by microwave flux-flow Hall effect
similarity 0.94R. Ogawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified