Superconductivity, charge-density waves, antiferromagnetism, and phase separation in the Hubbard-Holstein model
Seher Karakuzu, Luca F. Tocchio, Sandro Sorella, Federico Becca
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205145 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By using variational wave functions and quantum Monte Carlo techniques, we investigate the interplay between electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions in the two-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model. Here, the ground-state phase diagram is triggered by several energy scales, i.e., the electron hopping t, the on-site electron-electron interaction U, the phonon energy ω0, and the electron-phonon coupling g. At half filling, the ground state is an antiferromagnetic insulator for U≳2g2/ω0, while it is a charge-density-wave (or bipolaronic) insulator for U≲2g2/ω0. In addition to these phases, we find a superconducting phase that intrudes between them. For ω0/t=1, superconductivity emerges when both U/t and 2g2/tω0 are small; then, by increasing the value of the phonon energy ω0, it extends along the transition line between antiferromagnetic and charge-density-wave insulators. Away from half filling, phase separation occurs when doping the charge-density-wave insulator, while a uniform (superconducting) ground state is found when doping the superconducting phase. In the analysis of finite-size effects, it is extremely important to average over twisted boundary conditions, especially in the weak-coupling limit and in the doped case.
Similar papers
Superconductivity, charge-density waves, antiferromagnetism, and phase separation in the Hubbard-Holstein model
similarity 0.92Seher Karakuzu et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.00278
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and antiferromagnetism for an extended Hubbard Hamiltonian: Role of correlated hopping in a single-band model
similarity 0.91G. A. Lara & G. G. Cabrera
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between antiferromagnetism and superconductivity in a doped Hubbard model with anisotropic interaction
similarity 0.91Runyu Ma & Tianxing Ma
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metal-insulator transitions, superconductivity, and magnetism in the two-band Hubbard model
similarity 0.90Caterina De Franco et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripes versus superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice
similarity 0.89Mingpu Qin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the 2D Hubbard model: Electron doping is different
similarity 0.89D. Eichenberger & D. Baeriswyl · 2008 · arXiv:0808.0433
Source status unknown — claims are unverified