Andreev reflection in a Y-shaped graphene-superconductor device
Chao Wang, Yonglian Zou, Juntao Song, Yu-Xian Li
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035403 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Using the nonequilibrium Green function method, we study the Andreev reflection in a Y-shaped graphene-superconductor device by tight-binding model. Considering both the zigzag and armchair terminals, we confirm that the zigzag terminals are the better choice for detecting the Andreev reflection in the absence of external field. Due to scattering from the boundaries of the finite-size center region, the difference between Andreev retroreflection and specular reflection is hard to distinguish. Although adjusting the size of the device makes the difference visible, to distinguish them quantitatively is still impossible through the transport conductance of a three-terminal device. The problem is circumvented when applying a perpendicular magnetic field on the center region, which makes the incident electrons and the reflected holes propagate along the edge or the interface. In this case, the retroreflected and specular reflected holes from the different bands have opposite effective masses, therefore the moving direction of one is opposite to the other. Which external terminal the reflected holes flow into depends entirely on the kind of the Andreev reflection. Therefore, the specular Andreev reflection can be clearly distinguished from the retroreflected one in the presence of strong magnetic field, even for the device with finite size.
Similar papers
Controllable Andreev Retroreflection and Specular Andreev Reflection in a Four-Terminal Graphene-Superconductor Hybrid System
similarity 0.91Shu-guang Cheng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced specular Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
similarity 0.89Abhiram Soori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev and normal reflections in gapped bilayer graphene–superconductor junctions
similarity 0.89Panch Ram et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The influence of anti-chiral edge states on Andreev reflection in graphene-superconductor junction
similarity 0.89Chao Wang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.06649
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specular Andreev reflection of asymmetric fermions in graphene under strain
similarity 0.88Bumned Soodchomshom · 2010 · arXiv:1009.4661
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specular Andreev reflection and Andreev interference in an Ising superconductor junction
similarity 0.88Gaoyang Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified